Twitter turned 10 years old on Monday.
It’s been 10 years since the appearance of Twitter on the Internet?
It does feel like ages. But still, it’s incredible to think how far it’s come, how it continues to thrive in the face of Instagram and Snapchat and all the other social media platforms threatening to overtake it, and how much impact Twitter has had on the world.
Twitter started the ‘microblog’ trend
When it started, the word ‘microblog’ was coined. Twitter started when the world was obsessed with blogs (unfortunately that obsession for long-form has died down). And Twitter was something that acted like a blog but better.
The problem with blogs at that time was that people loved to start it but had problems maintaining it. People just couldn’t post every day and would leave it for weeks at a time.
And they felt guilty.
Guilty that they couldn’t keep the blog active, but blogs just required too much maintenance.
And therein lay the answer: Twitter.
Twitter was shorter, information was more bite-sized, and it worked great for people who loved to blog but oh I just don’t have the time or energy to bang out 500 words but yeah I can write one of two sentences that encompass what I’m feeling whether it’s joyful or a rant or something completely insignificant really.
Twitter became a way for people to throw out little information like what are they doing right now, what they were eating, what they were feeling.
And till now, the idea of short form still remains. With our attention spans dwindling, it takes a really punchy headline for us to click on a link. We are more likely to read a 250 word news article than a 1000 word news piece. And long form is an idea that is just… growing less and less appealing.
Twitter became a source for live-news updates.
At first Twitter was just this significant micro-blogging channel for people to express their immediate feelings, reactions and LOLs.
But then Twitter evolved.
When you could add photos to your 140 character musings, everyone started doing it because the visual appeal is far stronger than scrolling through words.
But when Twitter users started sharing photos of things before news agencies did, that’s when Twitter moved to a whole new level.
All of a sudden, we realised that we didn’t have to wait for journalists to write about the fire happening before our very eyes, or the gang fight or the plane crash.
We could do it ourselves.
And that’s what millions of users did, suddenly turning themselves into citizen journalists with just a few tappings on a screen.
In 2009, a Twitter user posted the first photo of US Airways Flight 1549 after its crash into the Hudson River.
In 2011 and 2012, the Arab Spring revolution blossomed with the help of the Twitter Revolution, where social media activists spread awareness of the goings-on in the Arab Spring and generate debates.
These conversations were important as they propelled real-life action and protests on the ground. Some experts believe that social media played an extremely important role during the Arab Spring.
And of course, who could forget the Twitter user who live-tweeted the Osama Bin Laden raid? IT consultant @ReallyVirtual live-tweeted unusual events going on near his place such as a helicopter hovering around, before realising that he was tweeting a top secret attempt to kill Osama Bin Laden.
No one needed a degree, or a fancy camera, or even a title of a reporter. Twitter put everyone on a level playing field. Anyone could read live news, and more importantly, anyone could write them.
Twitter forces you to condense your thoughts.
140 characters isn’t really much space. But that was Twitter’s winning formula. People caught up on news like they were having snacks instead of the entire main course and dessert.
They had room for more.
People weren’t reading 3 or 4 news articles and moving on to the next thing that demanded their attention (and there’s plenty of things that demand our instant attention nowadays), they were skimming through 10 or 11 news headlines, and digesting more varied new stories in the same amount of time.
The debate of whether this if good or bad can go either way, really.
On one hand, you can argue that condensing your argument into 140 characters or less really takes away much-needed space. It means that you don’t have enough space to fully encapsulate exactly what you mean, and to weigh out the pros and cons. It is simply, not enough.
But on the other hand, condensing everything makes you compact your thoughts into a neat 140 characters or less argument with a strong basis. You can argue that using more words in an argument is basically fluffing it up, and you lose the essence of the message through plenty of waffling. Condensing everything means that you get right to the heart of the argument, right to the core of what you want to say.
And isn’t that how you win an argument?
Personally I prefer the first opinion, but that’s because I enjoy the long form. However, the reality of this modern society is that everything demands instant attention like a message or Facebook notification or new email. And most people prefer to get right to the heart of a news story or debate.
And that’s why Twitter is the mega superstar in the social media world.
Happy birthday Twitter!
What’s your favourite social media platform? How do you think it compares to Twitter?